![]() Two Torros that might be of interest are the Mk IV and late Tiger. I have both versions of the Sherman as guns quite different between the two. My preference is WW2 tanks and have most of the H.L. So what am I missing that might persuade me to buy more Torros. A nice wood box, seem too good to throw out but not sure what to do with them.version can be adjusted to be compatible with H.L. Nice muzzle flash on firing, but at a cost of no BB option in the I.R.Pro version where key components are metal. I hear robustness is better but curious why and how if compared to H.L.Option to choose 3 levels of more steel parts but trade off of more weight and higher price.Turret can go up or down whereas Torro cycles in one direction. ![]() Excellent instalation instructions, whereas almost totally lacking for the Mk III.Accessories fit better some parts for my Mk III were too big to fit in the slots.My Torro Sherman and Pz Mk III have differences but no version references Version Control, currently 7.0 so know what you are getting.As a result of the above,is lighter for longer battery running time.Metal robustness where it matters in gears and road wheels.More radio controlled functions such as Volume and Lights On/Off to name two of many.Torros are way too sensitive, especially in turns. Much superior progressive acceleration and turns.Other benefits over the Torro besides price: What am I missing as to whether to get more Torros. ![]() are superior aside from costing half the price for the Pro version I currently have 9 H.L.and two Torro tanks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |